Skip to content
Rustem Bigari
  • Case studies
  • Models
  • Publications
  • CV
  • Contact
ENRU

Rustem Bigari

PhD, Digital Transformation Expert. GovTech & AI Policy Advisor.

Sections

  • Case studies
  • Models
  • Publications
  • CV
  • Contact

Elsewhere

  • LinkedIn
  • Telegram
  • Google Scholar

© 2026 Rustem Bigari. All rights reserved.

Site development by Belonozhkin VladimirSite development by Belonozhkin Vladimir
ENRU
  1. Home/
  2. Models/
  3. Tax system dynamics

MODEL-03

Tax system dynamics

Two stock-and-flow models: income tax revenue, and VAT administration.

What this model shows

Why a higher rate does not mean higher revenue, and why audit speed matters more than audit headcount. Both models run 10 years and 90 days respectively.

Assumptions built into it

  • Evasion grows with the square of the rate, scaled by a sensitivity factor, and jumps above a 40% rate. It is capped at 85%.
  • Each point of tax rate shaves 0.05 points off annual growth; growth is floored at −5%.
  • The tax base compounds monthly; the run is 120 months from a base of 1000.
  • VAT: inflow of new schemes is 50 per day and falls as automation and audit speed rise; manual capacity is 15 per day.
  • VAT unit cost is 100 automated versus 200 manual; the run is 90 days from a stock of 1000.

System dynamics: US tax model

Revenue (year 10)
$288.5
Evasion (year 10)
3.1%
Base / GDP (year 10)
$1191.1
Avg. GDP growth
1.76%
The chart loads when this block comes into view.
Influence diagram: tax rate → evasion → growth → revenue

Scenarios

25%

0.05

3.0%

System dynamics: VAT administration

Grey VAT balance (90 days)
349
Budget expenses
113
Control efficiency
+65.1%
The chart loads when this block comes into view.
Influence diagram: automation → speed → grey VAT

Model structure (stock & flow)

New schemes · Inflow

23.1 ₸/day

Budget (recoveries) · Outflow

23.2 ₸/day

Grey VAT (stock): 349

15

87%

All models